Continuing professional development as consultants
Submitted: 22 December 2020
Accepted: 8 February 2021
Published online: 5 October, TAPS 2021, 6(4), 146-147
https://doi.org/10.29060/TAPS.2021-6-4/PV2453
Simon Tso
Jephson Dermatology Centre, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
Continuing professional development (CPD) is a professional obligation of clinicians aiming to ‘improve the safety and quality of care provided for patients and the public’ and ‘covers the development of your knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviours across all areas of your professional practice’ (General Medical Council UK, 2020). The professional practice of clinicians is highly variable and may include clinical practice, management, education, academia and research, media and public engagement, advisory to charities and pharmaceutical companies, politics, and working for the government. Despite the varied role of clinicians, literature suggested that clinicians undertake the majority of their CPD in their specialist areas, although many clinicians are also interested in undertaking CPD in areas outside their specialty (Maher et al., 2017).
The year of 2020 was a challenging and sobering year for clinicians across the world with redeployment of clinicians from many specialities to undertake activities they were less familiar with (Seah, 2020). The phrase ‘CPD’ took on a new personal meaning through the change of my role as a consultant dermatologist during the COVID-19 pandemic and an unsuccessful application for a National Institute for Health Research (UK) advanced research fellowship so that I can establish myself as an independent researcher.
I volunteered to help with COVID-19 research at my employing hospital, but unexpectedly found myself becoming a site principal investigator for the UK nationally prioritised Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY Trial) that led to the discovery of dexamethasone as a treatment for COVID-19 hospitalised patients requiring oxygen therapy or ventilation support (RECOVERY Collaborative Group et al., 2021). It was a baptism of fire learning to manage and deliver the clinical trial while frantically trying to familiarise myself with the literature on pharmacology of trial medicinal products, human physiology and COVID-19 literature. I sought the counsel from my hospital’s senior research nurses, and research manager to jointly govern and deliver the trial at my hospital; and I also talked to colleagues and doctors in training to learn about the practicalities of managing COVID-19 patients in clinical settings. I kept records of my CPD related to COVID-19, reflected upon these experiences in my learning portfolio and discussed these experiences in my annual appraisal. These records also serve as evidence to justify my practices outside my area of specialism. Although I may possess relevant transferable skills and experience that facilitates me to lead and undertake work outside my speciality during the unprecedented time of the pandemic, it is important to maintain insight about our own limitations; learn from different resources; seek and accept help from others in a position of knowledge and experience whoever they may be, as this is crucial for delivering a safe service.
Despite my portfolio of varied research experience and higher research degree, I once held the wishful thinking that I could directly transition into an independent researcher due to my clinical role as a consultant. The feedback I received from the unsuccessful advanced research fellowship application has encouraged much needed reflexivity into my own strengths and limitations, and successfully challenged the naïve viewpoint that I once held. A consultant transitioning into an independent researcher is not an automatic process, but requires the progressive development of experience and credentials to justify the award of an advanced fellowship and it is ok to start from the beginning.
The literature described three broad categories of career paths: progressive, by chance and enthusiasts (Tuononen et al., 2018). CPD was crucial to my progressive career development into a consultant dermatologist and help me keep abreast with the latest evidence based clinical practices. Just-in-time CPD was important for me to discharge my leadership role as a site principal investigator in the RECOVERY Trial that I took on by chance as it was important for me to become knowledgeable about the topic and take responsibility about every aspect of the trial delivered at my site. I am enthusiastic about research and CPD is one of the many tools that can help me build the skills necessary to pursue clinical academia.
In conclusion, CPD is not just a professional obligation to keep ourselves up to date about evidence based practices in our specialty to deliver safe and high quality patient care, it is also a valuable tool to help us maintain our generalist knowledge outside our specialty (which we may rely upon if we get redeployed) and prepare us to reconfigure our career path.
Note on Contributor
Dr Simon Tso is a consultant dermatologist at the South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. He was responsible for conception and design of the work reported in the manuscript, reviewed the literature, drafted the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript submitted.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank his clinical and research work colleagues for their support throughout the pandemic.
Funding
There is no funding source required for this study.
Declaration of Interest
The author report no conflict of interest. The author is responsible for the content and writing of the article.
References
General Medical Council. (2020, December 11). Continuing professional development. General Medical Council United Kingdom. https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/guidance/continuing-professional-development
Maher, B., Faruqui, A., Horgan, M., Bergin, C., Tuathaigh, C. O., & Bennett, D. (2017). Continuing professional development and Irish hospital doctors: A survey of current use and future needs. Clinical Medicine (London), 17(4), 307-315. https://doi.org/ 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-4-307
RECOVERY Collaborative Group., Horby, P., Lim, W. S., Emberson, J. R., Mafham, M., Bell, J. L., Linsell, L., Staplin, N., Brightling, C., Ustianowski, A., Elmahi, E., Prudon, B., Green, C., Felton, T., Chadwick, D., Rege, K., Fegan, C., Chappell, L. C., Faust, S. N., … Landray, M. J. (2021). Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(8), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
Seah, K. M. (2020). Redeployment in COVID-19: Old dogs and new tricks. Emergency Medicine Journal, 37(7), 456. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/emermed-2020-210052
Tuononen, T. A., Suominen, A. L., & Lammintakanen, J. (2018). Career path from a dentist to a leader. Leadership in Health Services (Bradford England), 31(4), 384-397. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/LHS-08-2017-0051
*Simon Tso
Jephson Dermatology Centre,
South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust,
Warwick,
CV34 5BW, United Kingdom.
Tel: 01926495321 Ext 4569
Email: simontso@doctors.org.uk
Announcements
- Fourth Thematic Issue: Call for Submissions
The Asia Pacific Scholar is now calling for submissions for its Fourth Thematic Publication on “Developing a Holistic Healthcare Practitioner for a Sustainable Future”!
The Guest Editors for this Thematic Issue are A/Prof Marcus Henning and Adj A/Prof Mabel Yap. For more information on paper submissions, check out here! - Best Reviewer Awards 2023
TAPS would like to express gratitude and thanks to an extraordinary group of reviewers who are awarded the Best Reviewer Awards for 2023.
Refer here for the list of recipients. - Most Accessed Article 2023
The Most Accessed Article of 2023 goes to Small, sustainable, steps to success as a scholar in Health Professions Education – Micro (macro and meta) matters.
Congratulations, A/Prof Goh Poh-Sun & Dr Elisabeth Schlegel! - Best Article Award 2023
The Best Article Award of 2023 goes to Increasing the value of Community-Based Education through Interprofessional Education.
Congratulations, Dr Tri Nur Kristina and co-authors! - Volume 9 Number 1 of TAPS is out now! Click on the Current Issue to view our digital edition.
- Best Reviewer Awards 2022
TAPS would like to express gratitude and thanks to an extraordinary group of reviewers who are awarded the Best Reviewer Awards for 2022.
Refer here for the list of recipients. - Most Accessed Article 2022
The Most Accessed Article of 2022 goes to An urgent need to teach complexity science to health science students.
Congratulations, Dr Bhuvan KC and Dr Ravi Shankar. - Best Article Award 2022
The Best Article Award of 2022 goes to From clinician to educator: A scoping review of professional identity and the influence of impostor phenomenon.
Congratulations, Ms Freeman and co-authors. - Volume 8 Number 3 of TAPS is out now! Click on the Current Issue to view our digital edition.
- Best Reviewer Awards 2021
TAPS would like to express gratitude and thanks to an extraordinary group of reviewers who are awarded the Best Reviewer Awards for 2021.
Refer here for the list of recipients. - Most Accessed Article 2021
The Most Accessed Article of 2021 goes to Professional identity formation-oriented mentoring technique as a method to improve self-regulated learning: A mixed-method study.
Congratulations, Assoc/Prof Matsuyama and co-authors. - Best Reviewer Awards 2020
TAPS would like to express gratitude and thanks to an extraordinary group of reviewers who are awarded the Best Reviewer Awards for 2020.
Refer here for the list of recipients. - Most Accessed Article 2020
The Most Accessed Article of 2020 goes to Inter-related issues that impact motivation in biomedical sciences graduate education. Congratulations, Dr Chen Zhi Xiong and co-authors.