For Reviewers
Policy
Standard peer review procedures are used for submissions. The committee may request for suggestions of reviewers from the authors. The Committee retains the sole right to make decisions on the review process.
Peer Review Process
MediXperience employs peer reviews process.
Reviewers will be asked to consider the following points:
- Relevance
- Quality
- Authenticity
- Recommendation – Accept/Revision/Reject? Reviewers who recommend revisions are required to indicate if they would like to review a revision of this paper.
Review Process Update
Please note that the current manuscript review process is conducted manually. We are in the process of transitioning to a new online submission and review portal, which will be launched soon. Thank you for your patience as we work to enhance your experience.
Policy on the Use of a Trainee/Colleague/Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in Reviewing the Work for MediXperience
Reviewers who seek assistance from a trainee or colleague in the performance of a review should acknowledge these individuals’ contributions in the written comments submitted to the editor.
Reviewers should disclose to the Committee if and how AI and AI-assisted technologies are being used to facilitate their review. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript as outlined above, which may prohibit the uploading of the manuscript to software or AI or AI-assisted technologies where confidentiality cannot be assured.